|
A judge has ruled that cyclists who don't
wear a helmet are partly to blame for their injuries even if the
accident wasn't their fault - 20th
March 2009
A High Court Judge has ruled that
cyclists injured in
accidents are partly to blame for their injuries if they are
not wearing a helmet, even if the accident was not their fault.
The ruling which has upset the cycling world could see
cyclist accident injury
compensation claims reduced by around 15% even when the
accident was through no fault of their own.
Many believe it is the beginning of measures to force cyclists
to wear helmets, with the
Mayor of London, Boris Johnson believing riders should have
the right to choose "hatless, sun-blessed, wind-swept liberty"
or "helmeted security".
Commenting: “In my efforts to do the right thing I have ended up
giving offence to both opposing factions,” he said, “As soon as
I started wearing a helmet I was denounced as a wimp. As soon as
I was pictured not wearing a helmet, I was attacked for sending
out the wrong signal.”
The judges ruling follows a case brought after a cyclist, Robert
Smith was riding to a friend’s house in Brightlingsea in Essex
in 2005 without a helmet, when he was in a collision with a
motorcycle ridden by Michael Finch.
Mr Smith was near the centre of the road ready to turn right,
when Mr Finch who was driving at excessive speed, attempted to
pass on the offside. They were involved in a collision and Mr
Smith suffered a serious brain
injury as a result of the accident.
The judge concluded that Mr Smiths head hit the ground at more
than 12mph so a helmet would not of made any difference but
said: “There can be no doubt that the failure to wear a helmet
may expose the cyclist to risk of greater injury”, adding
subject to limitations, “any injury sustained may be the
cyclist’s own fault”.
This ruling could affect
cycle accident compensation claims if the 'contributory
negligence' principle is picked up by insurers where the rider
is not wearing a helmet.
Evidence from Western Australia suggests helmets may not reduce
cycle accident head
injuries. When helmets were made compulsory there, cyclists
dropped by around 33%, but head injuries dropped by only 10%.
The British Medical Association
(BMA) believe helmets should be compulsory for cyclists
saying: “Doctors working in accident and emergency see at first
hand the devastating impacts
cycling injuries can
have.”
|